President Dwight D. Eisenhower and his secretary of state, John Foster Dulles, deployed a tactic Chris Tudda calls "rhetorical diplomacy"—sounding a belligerent note of anti-Communism in speeches, addresses, press conferences, and private meetings with allies and with Moscow. Yet all the while, Tudda discloses, the two were confidentially committed to a contradictory course—the establishment of a strong system of collective security in Western Europe, peaceful accommodation of the Soviet Union, and the maintenance of a new, albeit divided Germany.
Tudda explores the Eisenhower administration's pursuit of these two mutually exclusive diplomatic strategies and reveals how failure to reconcile them endangered the fragile peace of the 1950s. He builds his argument through three case studies: the administration's badgering the French and their allies to ratify the European Defense Community, its threat to liberate Eastern Europe from Moscow's rule, and its forcing the issue of German reunification. By emphasizing the threat from the Soviet Union, Eisenhower and Dulles were trying to promote an activist as opposed to isolationist foreign policy. But their rhetorical diplomacy intensified Cold War tensions with European allies as well as with Moscow and effectively overwhelmed the administration's true diplomatic aims.
Based on American, British, Eastern European, and Soviet primary sources—many only recently unearthed—The Truth Is Our Weapon is a major contribution to the historiography of Eisenhower's diplomacy and an important statement about the implications of public and private policymaking.
Chris Tudda has been a historian in the Declassification and Publishing Division of the Office of the Historian, Department of State, since 2003. He is the author of The Truth Is Our Weapon: The Rhetorical Diplomacy of Dwight D. Eisenhower and John Foster Dulles.
Praise for The Truth Is Our Weapon
“Tudda’s range of research is most impressive. . . . He does not make the mistake of relying solely on speech transcripts, memoirs, or generic historical accounts. . . . For scholars who accept the inadequacy of the sticks-and-stones cliché and wish to learn more about the complex chess game of sticks and carrots, it is a good place to start.”—Political Science Quarterly
“Chris Tudda is a welcome addition to the ranks of these cutting-edge historians. His message is that the effects of public speech are not only important but often unexpected, misunderstood, and thus out of the speaker’s control.”—International History Review
“Meticulously researched. . . . Chris Tudda has made a significant contribution to the field of public diplomacy and raises questions and issues with which subsequent studies will have to grapple.”—Reviews in American History
Found an Error? Tell us about it.