Delaying the Dream
Southern Senators and the Fight against Civil Rights, 1938-1965
Winner of the D.B. Hardeman Prize
Few historical events lend themselves to such a sharp delineation between right and wrong as does the civil rights struggle. Consequently, many historical accounts of white resistance to civil rights legislation emphasize the ferocity of the opposition, from the Ole Miss riots to the depredations of Eugene "Bull" Conner's Birmingham police force to George Wallace's stand on the schoolhouse steps. While such hostile episodes frequently occurred in the Jim Crow South, civil rights adversaries also employed other, less confrontational but remarkably successful, tactics to deny equal rights to black Americans. In Delaying the Dream, Keith M. Finley explores gradations in the opposition by examining how the region's principal national spokesmen--its United States senators--addressed themselves to the civil rights question and developed a concerted plan of action to thwart legislation: the use of strategic delay.
Prior to World War II, Finley explains, southern senators recognized the fall of segregation as inevitable and consciously changed their tactics to delay, rather than prevent, defeat, enabling them to frustrate civil rights advances for decades. As public support for civil rights grew, southern senators transformed their arguments to limit the use of overt racism and appeal to northerners. They granted minor concessions on bills only tangentially related to civil rights while emasculating those with more substantive provisions. They garnered support by nationalizing their defense of sectional interests and linked their defense of segregation with constitutional principles to curry favor with non-southern politicians. While the senators achieved success at the federal level, Finley shows, they failed to challenge local racial agitators in the South, allowing extremism to flourish. The escalation of white assaults on peaceful protesters in the 1950s and 1960s finally prompted northerners to question southern claims of tranquility under Jim Crow. When they did, segregation came under direct attack, and the principles that had informed strategic delay became obsolete.
Finley's analysis goes beyond traditional images of the quest for racial equality--the heroic struggle, the southern extremism, the filibusters--to reveal another side to the conflict. By focusing on strategic delay and the senators' foresight in recognizing the need for this tactic, Delaying the Dream adds a fresh perspective to the canon on the civil rights era in modern American history.
Keith M. Finley is assistant director of the Center for Southeast Louisiana Studies and an instructor of history at Southeastern Louisiana University.
Praise for Delaying the Dream
“Finley offers a lively account of how civil rights legislation made it through (or not) the rules and procedures of the Senate. Historians of the modern South, of national political history, and of the black freedom struggle will find reading this book to be well worth their time.”—American Historical Review
“Keith M. Finley adds a new dimension to this scholarship in his fine study of southern senators’ efforts to curtail federal civil rights legislation. . . . An insightful analysis of the fallacies and contradictions of segregationist thought.”—Journal of American History
“A discerning and well-documented study of an underdeveloped aspect of southern white resistance to the civil rights movement. . . . A first-rate achievement and a welcome addition to understanding southern politics.”—North Carolina Historical Review
“Delaying the Dream is a smart, judicious, and useful look inside the vaunted southern opposition to civil rights, and a must-read for serious scholars of political history.”—Florida Historical Quarterly
Found an Error? Tell us about it.